Blog
Arhiv za oznako »Usability«
Rezervirajte vstopnico za projekcijo dokumentarca Oblikuj novo gospodarstvo
V četrtek, 17.5. bomo ob 12. uri pripravili javno projekcijo dokumentarnega filma Oblikuj novo gospodarstvo, prvič tudi s podnapisi v slovenščini.
Vstop je brezplačen. Obvezna je sicer rezervacija vstopnice prek
www.vizuarna.si/rezerviraj-vstopnico/
Projekcija bo v Kinudvor, v Ljubljani, Kolodvorska ulica 13.
Hvala že vnaprej za vaš obisk in kmalu do svidenja. Po projekciji bo čas tudi za sproščen pogovor o tematiki filma.
Ste zadovoljni s pregledanim? Bodite obveščeni o novih blog zapisih neposredno v vaš RSS bralnik
ali
![]() |
Marko Savić. |
Vir filma:
http://www.designthenewbusiness.com/
Dizajn interakcije: kaj je dizajn interakcije? Kdo so dizajnerji interakcije? Kam gredo?
Dizajn interakcije je vsaj zame odkritje. Ne interaktivni dizajn temveč dizajn interakcije. V angleščini »interaction design». Odkritje, ki je k temu precej pripomoglo je ključni nagovor g. Richarda Buchanana, na konferenci Interaction 11 letos februarja v Boulder Coloradu.
Mislim, da si je vredno zapomniti vsaj tri zadeve iz tega izvrstnega govora.
1.
Produkt naj bo:
- koristen (»useful»)
- uporaben (»usable»)
- zaželen (»desirable»)
2.
Kaj je interakcija? Interakcija pomeni kako so ljudje povezani z drugimi ljudmi skozi posredovani vpliv produktov (»Interaction is how people relate to other people through the mediating influence of products»).
3.
Dizajn interakcije je nova disciplina misliti dizajna (»Interaction design is a new discipline of design thinking»).
Za ogled celotnega govora je pripet link do celotnega govora v angleščini. Priporočam!
p. s.: ob priliki obljubljam tudi komplet video s podnapisi v slovenščini.
![]() |
Marko Savić. |
Vir:
Richard Buchanan: Keynote, Interaction Design Association na Vimeo
A small case study of New York based corporations on reporting systems
This case study includes corporations with its headquarters in New York. In the small sample there are corporations like: PEPSICO, Thomson Reuters, WPP, LVMH and others.
It was interesting that in many cases, the LinkedIn proved to be valuable source of the information where are the headquarters of some of the corporations. Like, if I search for our company Vizuarna headquarters, the first result on Google is the Vizuarna’s profile on LinkedIn. Interesting, isn’t it? The same way it is possible to find some other corporations headquarters. And yes. Many of the worlds most known corporations actually have their headquarters in New York. Not necessary in New York City but still.
And after studying the reporting systems of some of the corporations in New York, what have I found out? The most important lesson: all of them have actually a reporting system established. No mistakes. Some have appointed even executives director for investment affairs. What were some of the best features in this reports in my opinion? Three things really to remember:
- first, one of the corporation studied has its interactive annual report made already in 2003. And the reports are published on the web site as way back as in 1999. And everything about the annual report is totally integrated into the site. Really remarkable. Interactive version made rather simple like a flash publication but with good possibilities of printing, mailing and others, be that the whole report or its part by pages.
- second, promise of the annual report, let say some kind of tactical tag-line, a sort or even really a brand promise explained in short and in details. That’s the way to do it. and
- third, the whole annual report presented in a summary. All the chapters are there but everything is in short. Really in short but with all relevant information. What do I really need to know about the income statement? There are really only 2×3 things to know. Revenues (in sales, financial, other) and expenses in the other way (again operations, financial and other) and that’s it. And some make even a summary from the summary. Shorter version of the short version. And that is true for other chapters of the annual report as well. That way it becomes more interesting for larger target groups not only for people who have to read the reports by duty. Enhanced transparency, I would called it.
There are some other things to be mentioned, like sharing possibilities on SlideShare or some reports really followed the line throughout the years. Just like their corporate strategy is to be followed (if successful), so have the annual reports its design consistency.
Gmail pri Google apps
Gmail (Google elektronska pošta) se je v zadnjih letih močno razširil tako na fizične osebe kot tudi na pravne. Tako ima sedaj vsaka gospodarska družba možnost brezplačno ustvariti do 50 elektronskih naslovov s svojo domeno. Seveda je storitev možno tudi nadgraditi z doplačilom. Ob elektronskih naslovih z lastno domeno, so zraven tudi drugi Google-ove programi, kot recimo Calendar, Docs… Več o tem najdete na strani http://www.google.com/apps/. S preprosto prijavo hitro pridemo da administratorske konzole, kjer imamo možnost nastavitve lastnega znaka družbe in druge podobne zadeve. Ko je vse nared prestavimo trenutne MX strežnike na Google-ove in ob osvežitvi domen, naš novi sistem že deluje.
Med samo postavitvijo sistema sem naletel na nekatere težave. Recimo ena večjih je bila HTML podpis za elektronsko pošto. Namreč z nastavitvami, ki nam jih ponuja sistem je možno nastaviti le tekstoven (t.i. »plain text«) podpis. Za take reči obstaja ogromno rešitev toda vsaka ima manjšo pomanjkljivost… Recimo vsadek (»plugin«) za Mozilla Firefox z imenom Wisestamp, onemogoči, da si lahko sami v sporočilu nastavljamo barve. Vendar sem po nekaj preizkusih prišel do zaključka, da je trenutno najboljša rešitev zaznamek (»bookmark«), ki nam ga pomaga narediti skripta na strani http://projets.geekfg.net/.
Brezplačna različica sistema Google apps ponuja le 7GB prostora za shranjevanje e-pošte. To ni ne vem kako veliko, saj se predal kmalu napolni (odvisno od pridobljenih priponk). Res je sicer, da največji problem še vedno ostajajo vdori. Sploh popularni so na večjih brezplačnih aplikacijah, kjer imajo nadobudneži izzive. Obstajajo številni blog zapisi kako so vdrli v elektronski predal, pobrali pomembne podatke… Toda to je problem na katerega sami ne moremo vplivati kaj veliko…
So pa seveda tudi velike prednosti, saj ko je elektronska pošta postavljena, ne rabimo nobenega administratorja za dodajanje uporabnikov, spreminjanje njihovih pravic in imamo zelo malo možnosti da se bo sesul strežnik ali storitev na kateremu se izvaja delovanje. Podpira tudi IMAP strežnik, kar je mnogim ključnega pomena.
Ste zadovoljni s pregledanim? Bodite obveščeni o novih blog zapisih neposredno v vaš RSS bralnik
ali
About the book from Steve Krug: Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability
Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability by Steve Krug
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
I really don’t remember when was the last time I read a book in a day. The author himself suggest that this is a book for one longer flight. It’s true. I would absolutely agree.
I had borrowed a copy of a book from a college at my work few years ago. I have to say second edition was worth buying. Everybody involved in creating web pages and other user interfaces should gain a lot by only reading this book.
What have I learned? Web pages should be at least self-explanatory if not already self-evident. I agree still in 2010, that there are plenty of web users who still type a site entire URL in the Google search box (or as author claims in Yahoo‘s). In designing web page one should think like designing great billboards. You should make it obvious what is click-able. There is no smart answer to the dilemma wide versus deep site hierarchies. And yes, web navigation better be good. Author is a fan of tabs. Interesting. Usually the interface problem is just a reflection of deeper and harder to solve dilemma. The mission of an organization online is not the same as its (corpo)brand mission offline. All Web use is basically idiosyncratic.
One of the things I liked the most was the proposal of the Lost-our-lease testing. I surely hope that at my company we are going to try it out very soon. One funny thing I am going to remember is that FAQs are not QWWPWA (Questions we wish people would ask). It is interesting to know, in USA there is a Section 508 of the 1988 Amendments to the Rehabilitation Act, specifying accessibility standards for IT (and therefore web pages too).
Other books/articles that author recommends and I have to put it on my to read list is from Gary Klein: Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions and from Mary Theofanos & Janice Redish: Guidelines for Accessible and Usable Web Sites: Observing Users Who Work with Screen Readers.
Yes, actually I learned some other details too but this should be enough for you to decide whether to read this book.
Some usability issues to be aware of
When I started to design I only designed for print. After I finished my study at the Academy I got one web site to design. A complex one. It was hard work because there were so many things I had to think of for the first time. And after some time I learned more and more about developing and making usable and useful web site. And I am still learning. But there is one sentence that describes the user »Don’t make me think«.
Here are some tips that could help. I collected them from different sources.
1. Clickable areas
They should be big and visible and they should look different from the rest of the content. Large clickable area makes it easier to hover the mouse cursor over the link. We can make it bigger by using bigger font size or by increasing the padding around the link.
2. Pagination
Pagination is used to split the content onto several pages. It is common on websites that have long lists of items; like products in a store or pictures in a gallery. It makes the page faster to download and process.
But in some cases splitting the content isn’t a good solution. Like blog articles. More pages increase page views and this boosts their viewing statistics and allows them to charge more for each ad. But in that case, the article is more difficult to be read. There is one more problem, the SEO (Search engine optimization). If the content is split into more pages, each page holds less keywords about its topic. This may negatively affect the ranking of the article in search engine results.
3. Content on the page
It is not only good design that makes a usable page, copy is also very important. Design leads the visitor through the page, but s/he needs to read text to process information.
We normally jump from one piece of content to another, from one webpage to the next. We don’t read from the top to the bottom, but from whatever pops out at us first and then move to the next thing that captures our interest.

Basecamp landing page shows us how the visitor is lead through the page.
The copy should be structured in a certain way.
- Few points of focus. It can be achieved by using stronger colors and larger fonts or using images, such as icons next to the text.
- Headings should be informative. User should get the information quickly.
- Texts should be short and understandable. They should give only the essentials, because people won’t read long paragraphs.
4. Contacts
If you want to build loyal customers you have to show to your customers that you care. So it has to be easy to get in touch with them, but some websites don’t even have an email address or contact form on them. Last month I flew with Turkish Airlines and I wanted to complain about the meal on the plane. It took me 10 minutes to find the e-mail. My opinion about the company wasn’t any better because of that.
5. Registration
Some pages require registration to read the content and some you can browse without to log in. Registration can be seen as a barrier and it can decrease user participation. If a user knows the page content it will be more likely that s/he will sign in.
But people need to invest time and afford to register and they need to remember the username and password they used. The sign-up form should be as short as possible, user name or email address and password will be enough. Don’t ask for more information than needed.
6. Log-in links
Make them visible. User should find log-in link without problem.

7. Pop-ups for content presentation
To present the main content using pop-up isn’t the best idea because most of web browsers use popup-blocker to prevent pop-ups, ad blocks and further site content recognized as advertisement.
8. Invisible links
Visitors have to know where on site they are, what is the next step and was the last step.
9. Visual noise
Visual noise is one of the most typical problems large web-sites designers have to cope with. Too much information, which looks too similar in a small space won’t help, it will only confuse the user.
Source:







![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=79af13bd-0bce-46cc-b344-61e96128481e)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d3e95012-aac0-411f-ace3-cfbff7eee2ec)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f2c1ac84-9f3d-44e7-a7b6-20fc19a8affd)




